The prompt for this blog post makes me have to reach back to
early experiences in my Service Learning placement. After being at APEX youth center for nearly
three months now, the connections between Shakespeare and modern social
constructs have slowly revealed themselves.
I initially felt nervous about telling my fellow volunteers and managers
of the center that I was volunteering there in part to help further my studies
regarding Shakespeare. I’m already an outsider to the culture and location of
the youth center, what are they going to think of me when I tell them I’m here
to learn about Shakespeare? That is what I thought to myself. I was also nervous that I was not going to
have much luck being able to relate Shakespeare to a youth center for inner-city
kids who are not normally to keen to volunteers in the first place.
The first
time I met my fellow volunteers and supervisors, I was hoping I could get away
without telling them I was there for a Shakespeare class. All the other volunteers were either there on
their own good grace or are starting graduate studies in social work. When I answered their questions and told them
I was there for a Shakespeare class, they seem intrigued. I tried to explain to them how Shakespeare
and Service Learning related, but I probably failed miserably. However, in more recent weeks when I have
talked to groups of students from all over the country who have volunteered at
the center as part of a mission trips for their respective universities, I
think I have improved my answer. I tell them that my observations have been
geared to looking for social and cultural power struggles between the kids at
the center, the kids and the supervisors and the kids and the volunteers. This fits with my paper topic, which looks
into the relationship between social, political and hierarchal power with
violence in Titus Andronicus. Some of the people saw the relevance and
others thought it was a stretch, but I think I have finally been able to do a
good job explaining the social concepts I am trying to relate to my service.
The biggest thing I have gained from reading
Shakespeare is insight to the cause and effect nature of social contexts. None of Shakespeare’s plays have unnecessary
scenes or lines, every action and line has a consequence. Whether it is personal or social
consequences, Shakespeare’s plays are in constant motion of cause and effect
scenarios. In my opinion, this is
Shakespeare’s place in the real world. At
APEX I have seen how every actions and words of the kids effect their standing
or perception in the eyes of their peers and the workers at the center. Being a marginalized group (lower-income
African Americans) it is easy to think that these kids have greater
consequences for their actions, but at times they are the ones with power at
the center. They outnumber the
volunteers and workers and sometimes (most of the times) we are the outsiders
at the center who have to catch up to their actions and thoughts. It has been really interesting to see how
volunteers and workers at the center are often left powerless, by either not
knowing how to interact with the kids or by social and cultural barriers. I think that the kids observe everything I do
there just as much as I observe their actions.
There is no action that does not have a social or cultural judgment made
by the kids and volunteers alike. This
is how I’ve seen Shakespeare through my service learning, and it has taken form
in both subtle and noticeable ways.
This frank post gets right to the heart of what (I think) makes service learning both so difficult and so valuable in a Shakespearean context. When you write that the "actions and words of the kids [a]ffect their standing or perception in the eyes of their peers and the workers at the center," you're writing from a point of view that takes ordinary everyday speech and action seriously, whether it happens at Loyola or in central city. Shakespeare shared that view and helps us learn to see others as richly layered and complexly motivated, even when we struggle to understand the layers or motivations. Ultimately I think this makes us more ethical.
ReplyDelete